SourcePackage is distroseries specific - would be better labelled DistroSeriesSourcePackage
Bug #64079 reported by
Matthew Paul Thomas
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Launchpad itself |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
A Distribution has more than one DistributionSou
Similarly, a DistroSeries has more than one DistroSeriesour
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
affects: | launchpad-foundations → soyuz |
affects: | soyuz → launchpad-registry |
tags: | added: tech-debt |
summary: |
- SourcePackage should be DistroSeriesSourcePackage + SourcePackage is distroseries specific - would be better labelled + DistroSeriesSourcePackage |
To post a comment you must log in.
"...DistroRelease has more than one DistributionSou rcePackageRelea se..."
uhm DistroReleaseSo urcePackageRele ase, maybe
* DistributionSou rcePackage [DSP -> D + SP] rcePackageRelea se [DSPR -> D + SPR]
* DistributionSou
* DistroReleaseSo urcePackage [DRSP -> DR + SP] (currently SourcePackage [SP]) urcePackageRele ase [DRSPR -> DR + SPR]
* DistroReleaseSo
You're right, the current name is inconsistent. But as you know, also the pages are very confusing, I wonder if the best solution wouldn't be collapsing content classes and implementing missing properties in broswer code.