Ubuntu
xchat-gnome package

xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #413276 reported by Tony Espy on 2009-08-13

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #411820: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	xchat-gnome (Ubuntu)	Fix Released	Medium	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: xchat-gnome

Karmic ( 9.04 ) / amd64, system last updated this afternoon.

xchat-gnome 1:0.26.1-1ubuntu1

xchat-gnome crashed out of the blue on me...

Please let me know if there's any more information I can provide.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Aug 13 16:47:27 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xchat-gnome
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.26.1-1ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: xchat-gnome
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-5.24-generic
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0x7fb68cff6bec: mov 0x10(%rsi),%esi
PC (0x7fb68cff6bec) ok
source "0x10(%rsi)" (0x14017296ac) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
destination "%esi" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: xchat-gnome
StacktraceTop:
?? () from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
?? ()
Title: xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-5-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Tony Espy (awe) wrote on 2009-08-13:

Dependencies.txt Edit (5.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (571 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (52.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (779 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (1014 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (1.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (1.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2009-08-13: Stacktrace.txt (retraced)

Stacktrace.txt (retraced) Edit (12.8 KiB, text/plain)

StacktraceTop:_hb_ot_layout_skip_mark (face=0x17b47d0, ginfo=0x140172969c,
PosLookupSubTable::apply (this=0x7fb681082964,
hb_ot_layout_position_lookup (
_pango_ot_info_position (info=0x1668e30,
basic_engine_shape (engine=<value optimized out>,