Ubuntu
geda-gschem package

Please sync geda-gschem_1.4.3-2(universe) from debian unstable

Bug #328527 reported by Bhavani Shankar on 2009-02-12

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	geda-gschem (Debian)	Fix Released	Unknown	debbugs #515093
	geda-gschem (Ubuntu)	Fix Released	Wishlist	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: geda-gschem

Please sync the latest version from debian as they have updated the package to the latest upstream version.

geda-gschem (1:1.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added build-dep on intltool (closes: #514900)

geda-gschem (1:1.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream bug fix release

See original description

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) on 2009-02-12

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	nobody → bhavi
status:	New → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-12:

debdiff Edit (907.6 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-12:

the orig.tar.gz Edit (1.1 MiB, application/x-tar)

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-12:

Builds fine on my PPA

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22549740/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.geda-gschem_1%3A1.4.3-0ubuntu2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz

Regards

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	bhavi → nobody
status:	In Progress → Confirmed

Nathan Handler (nhandler) on 2009-02-13

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	nobody → nhandler
importance:	Undecided → Wishlist
status:	Confirmed → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-13:

the diff.gz file Edit (4.2 KiB, text/plain)

Nathan,

Oops changed a changelog comment to make it clear

Here is the new diff.gz

Revision history for this message

Nathan Handler (nhandler) wrote on 2009-02-13:

geda-gschem version 1:1.4.3-1 is currently in Debian unstable. This update request should be converted to a sync request. Please resubscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors once you do that. Thanks in advance.

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	nhandler → bhavi
status:	In Progress → Incomplete

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-13:

Okay! Doing it.....

Changed in geda-gschem:
status:	Incomplete → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-13:

debdiff Edit (1.4 KiB, text/plain)

Nathan actually its FTBFS

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22568837/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.geda-gschem_1%3A1.4.3-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

So adding intltool to build depends fixes FTBFS

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22569747/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.geda-gschem_1%3A1.4.3-1ubuntu2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz

Here is the diff:

Revision history for this message

Nathan Handler (nhandler) wrote on 2009-02-13:

Could you please submit your patch upstream to Debian? It appears that they have the same build issue: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=geda-gschem;ver=1%3A1.4.3-1;arch=i386;stamp=1234310137. Hopefully, they apply your patch and we can sync the package. Please add a bug watch to this Launchpad bug so we can track the progress.

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-13:

#10

Nathan,

I m in college right now.... When I reach home will do it...

Regards

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-13:

#11

Bug watch added.

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	bhavi → nobody
status:	In Progress → New

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-02-16: Re: Please sync geda-gschem_1.4.3(universe) from debian unstable

#12

@nathan,

we can sync the package now as debian has added build dependency on intltool which fixes FTBFS

Subscribing u-u-s

Regards

description:

updated

Nathan Handler (nhandler) on 2009-02-16

Changed in geda-gschem:
assignee:	nobody → nhandler
status:	New → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Nathan Handler (nhandler) wrote on 2009-02-16:

#13

This package will not build until LP Bug #32264 is resolved. This is due to the libgeda-dev (>= 1:1.4.3) not being satisfiable right now. I will monitor both of these bugs, and I will ACK this report once the newer version of libgeda is uploaded.

Revision history for this message

Peter TB Brett (peter-b) wrote on 2009-02-16:

#14

That should be Bug #322648, not Bug #32264.

Revision history for this message

Nathan Handler (nhandler) wrote on 2009-02-18:

#15

Bug #322648 has been ACK'd. As long as that sync is performed prior to this one, everything should be fine. So I am ACK'ing this sync request to make sure it is in the queue prior to Feature Freeze.