Please review and sponsor firefox-linkwidgets

i will create deb package for that,

It's been 2 months without a status update from Deepak so I am unassigning it and setting it back to Confirmed.

Im leaving extensions task as incomplete until all info in on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions or on this bug and i will move it over to the wiki if needed. I will compare wiki and these bugs to see if we can atleast package it or not, some are listed as cant for a few difference reasons.

ubuntu task not needed. I will look into this one myself and see what i can find out or need.

upstream page is http://clav.mozdev.org/ and it houses none of the info we need nor a source package.

never mind i found it i will add info on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions and see what we have

Found all the info and starting on this this week monday or tuesday.
all info in on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:22:00PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> ubuntu task not needed. I will look into this one myself and see what i
> can find out or need.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Status: Confirmed => Invalid
>

needs-packaging bugs should have the distro attached

 affects ubuntu
 status confirmed

 - Alexander

If I remember correctly, we should not mention "firefox" or "mozilla" in a package name, so maybe we could just use linkwidgets for the package name.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Saša Bodiroža wrote:
> If I remember correctly, we should not mention "firefox" or "mozilla" in
> a package name, so maybe we could just use linkwidgets for the package
> name.
>
I can agree to that but we would have to do that with the rest of them,
cant remember how many but there were a few that used firefox
Is there any reason we cant use firefox or mozilla? Im running low on
time lately so it might be a while till i get to these extensions for
the time being.
- --
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIcLenqig4QTwcPCoRAoqDAJkBKLbc2bql9tmqyIY5iCfyq/uuXwCfd36t
0PzBEf7QPSv+NjXiP74xico=
=LuuN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 12:16:40PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Saša Bodiroža wrote:
> > If I remember correctly, we should not mention "firefox" or "mozilla" in
> > a package name, so maybe we could just use linkwidgets for the package
> > name.
> >
> I can agree to that but we would have to do that with the rest of them,
> cant remember how many but there were a few that used firefox
> Is there any reason we cant use firefox or mozilla? Im running low on
> time lately so it might be a while till i get to these extensions for
> the time being.

Lets deal with old package names outside this bugreport. For this
extension we should use just "linkwidgets" as Saša suggests.

 - Alexander

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 12:16:40PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Saša Bodiroža wrote:
>>> If I remember correctly, we should not mention "firefox" or "mozilla" in
>>> a package name, so maybe we could just use linkwidgets for the package
>>> name.
>>>
>> I can agree to that but we would have to do that with the rest of them,
>> cant remember how many but there were a few that used firefox
>> Is there any reason we cant use firefox or mozilla? Im running low on
>> time lately so it might be a while till i get to these extensions for
>> the time being.
>
> Lets deal with old package names outside this bugreport. For this
> extension we should use just "linkwidgets" as Saša suggests.
>
> - Alexander
>
Thats good for me ;)

- --
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIcp9Uqig4QTwcPCoRArD0AJ9wbMop5U1YG4H7VVTLCsntYkX9XwCfc4O+
vXMEfOy4RGBxjM4wkkNu18M=
=hAdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

taking this again, im starting on it today.

Im done with it you can find it on my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive

bzr branches:
https://code.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/linkwidgets.ubuntu
https://code.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/linkwidgets.upstream

This is finished waiting for upload to Jaunty and dhould back port it to intrepid after it hits Jaunty.
Changed status to in progress

Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have
done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like
that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be
used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers
(eg, SeaMonkey).

On 11/12/2008 07:37 AM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have
> done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like
> that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be
> used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers
> (eg, SeaMonkey).
>
>
name of package is linkwidgets and it should work with all browsers it
supports iceweasel even sice we dont support iceweasel.

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from UnforgivenIII

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:55:37PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> On 11/12/2008 07:37 AM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> > Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have
> > done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like
> > that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be
> > used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers
> > (eg, SeaMonkey).
> >
> >
> name of package is linkwidgets and it should work with all browsers it
> supports iceweasel even sice we dont support iceweasel.
>

yes, linkwidgets is the right name.

 - Alexander

On 12/04/2008 06:59 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:55:37PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>> On 11/12/2008 07:37 AM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
>>> Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have
>>> done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like
>>> that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be
>>> used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers
>>> (eg, SeaMonkey).
>>>
>>>
>> name of package is linkwidgets and it should work with all browsers it
>> supports iceweasel even sice we dont support iceweasel.
>>
>
> yes, linkwidgets is the right name.
>
> - Alexander
>
This is finished waiting for a push to archives in Jaunty.

--
Sincerely Yours,
     John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
     -- Metallica from UnforgivenIII

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:21:35AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> On 12/04/2008 06:59 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:55:37PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> >> On 11/12/2008 07:37 AM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> >>> Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have
> >>> done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like
> >>> that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be
> >>> used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers
> >>> (eg, SeaMonkey).
> >>>
> >>>
> >> name of package is linkwidgets and it should work with all browsers it
> >> supports iceweasel even sice we dont support iceweasel.
> >>
> >
> > yes, linkwidgets is the right name.
> >
> > - Alexander
> >
> This is finished waiting for a push to archives in Jaunty.
>

Yeah. I didnt add sessions this time during UDS so we can make more
like a coding and work sprint out of this event. i hope sponsoring
extensions will be in line with that ;).

 - Alexander

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:16:18AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - [needs-packaging] firefox-linkwidgets
> + Please review and sponsor firefox-linkwidgets
>

thanks. pushed to ubuntu-dev area

 affects firefox-extensions
 status fixreleased

and uploaded a build to jaunty New queue

 affects ubuntu
 status fixcommitted

 - Alexander

On 12/21/2008 06:07 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:16:18AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>> ** Summary changed:
>>
>> - [needs-packaging] firefox-linkwidgets
>> + Please review and sponsor firefox-linkwidgets
>>
>
> thanks. pushed to ubuntu-dev area
>
> affects firefox-extensions
> status fixreleased
>
> and uploaded a build to jaunty New queue
>
> affects ubuntu
> status fixcommitted
>
>
> - Alexander
>
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-extensions
> Status: In Progress => Fix Released
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>
Thanks

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

note:
i need to update and make changes as follows refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview

# ensure mozilla-devscripts 0.15 is used
# ensure that ${xpi:Depends} is used and be sure to add it under Recommends: field.
# ensure that no packages (browsers / mail clients) are in Depends: cause ${xpi:Depends} will do the trick for us
# ensure that Standards-Version 3.8.3 is used.
# ensure that you add reference to this wiki page in debian/changelog.
# verify that the extension works with ffox 3.5
# ensure that the extension do *not* ship an extra license file. Make use of MOZ_XPI_DOCUMENTED_LICENSE_FILES feature to remove them eventually.

addon not found on https://addons.mozilla.org/
change status to invalid