libX11-6: missing links

Bug #13362 reported by Debian Bug Importer
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libx11 (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
libx11 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #297315 http://bugs.debian.org/297315

Revision history for this message
In , Julien Cristau (julien-cristau) wrote : Re: Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links

On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote:

> Package: libX11-6
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> On my system I had to put these symbolic links
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
> in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11
>
Hi,

this is not a bug, the .so symlinks are provided by the -dev packages
(libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev), as they are not needed at
runtime. They are not, and should not be, included in the library
packages themselves.
Closing this spurious bug report.

Regards,
Julien

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #297315 http://bugs.debian.org/297315

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:23:23 +0000
From: michael <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: libX11-6: missing links

Package: libX11-6
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

On my system I had to put these symbolic links
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11

Thanks, Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libX11-6 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xfree86-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii xlibs-data 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client data

-- no debconf information

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:16 +0100
From: Julien Cristau <email address hidden>
To: michael <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links

On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote:

> Package: libX11-6
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> On my system I had to put these symbolic links
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
> in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11
>
Hi,

this is not a bug, the .so symlinks are provided by the -dev packages
(libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev), as they are not needed at
runtime. They are not, and should not be, included in the library
packages themselves.
Closing this spurious bug report.

Regards,
Julien

Revision history for this message
In , Julien Cristau (julien-cristau) wrote :

michael, you should copy your replies to the bug report, so that other
peoples can read them. (I did this for this one)

On 28/02/2005-17:57, michael bane wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote:
> >
> > > Package: libX11-6
> > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags: patch
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > >
> > > On my system I had to put these symbolic links
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
> > > in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is not a bug, the .so symlinks are provided by the -dev packages
> > (libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev), as they are not needed at
> > runtime. They are not, and should not be, included in the library
> > packages themselves.
> > Closing this spurious bug report.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Julien
>
> Julien - hope you don't mind a quick "thanks for prompt reply"! I didn't
> realise the above so is it worth amending the libX11 and libX11-dev doc
> (package info) to say if you require to link against X11 etc you need
> the -dev package too?
>
> Cheers, Michael
>
Personally, I think it's fairly obvious you need the devel package when
you want to use a library for development, but as I'm not the package
maintainer, I'm not the one you should try to convince :)

Regards,
Julien

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:24:55 +0100
From: Julien Cristau <email address hidden>
To: michael bane <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links

michael, you should copy your replies to the bug report, so that other
peoples can read them. (I did this for this one)

On 28/02/2005-17:57, michael bane wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote:
> >
> > > Package: libX11-6
> > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags: patch
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > >
> > > On my system I had to put these symbolic links
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
> > > in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is not a bug, the .so symlinks are provided by the -dev packages
> > (libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev), as they are not needed at
> > runtime. They are not, and should not be, included in the library
> > packages themselves.
> > Closing this spurious bug report.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Julien
>
> Julien - hope you don't mind a quick "thanks for prompt reply"! I didn't
> realise the above so is it worth amending the libX11 and libX11-dev doc
> (package info) to say if you require to link against X11 etc you need
> the -dev package too?
>
> Cheers, Michael
>
Personally, I think it's fairly obvious you need the devel package when
you want to use a library for development, but as I'm not the package
maintainer, I'm not the one you should try to convince :)

Regards,
Julien

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

PEBKAC

Revision history for this message
In , Branden Robinson (branden) wrote : severity of 297315 is normal, tagging 297315 ...

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 297315 normal
tags 297315 + wontfix
retitle 297315 libx11-6: doesn't ship the .so symlink that libx11-dev ships

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:12:18 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: severity of 297315 is normal, tagging 297315 ...

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 297315 normal
tags 297315 + wontfix
retitle 297315 libx11-6: doesn't ship the .so symlink that libx11-dev ships

Revision history for this message
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote :

Marked as WONTFIX in Debian in March 2005

Changed in libx11:
status: Unconfirmed → Rejected
Changed in libx11:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.